A Public Resource Compiled by the

Solidago Foundation

1150 Main St. #24
Northampton, MA 01060
501c3 nonprofit
Solidago.org

Donor to anti-GMO organizations as part of a broader philanthropic strategy

Key People

  • Elizabeth Barajas-Román, Chief Executive Officer
  • Linda Stout, President
  • Sarah Christiansen, Program Director
  • Jeff Rosen, Chief Financial Officer

Solidago Foundation

Founded in 1996, the Solidago Foundation supports a wide variety of progressive political causes, with special emphasis on climate justice, workers’ rights and wealth inequality. Although the foundation doesn’t take an official stance on crop biotechnology, it has partnered with organizations throughout its history that lobby against GMO crops and campaign to make organic agriculture a bigger contributor to global food production.

In December 2015, the foundation lent its support to anti-biotech activism when chief financial officer Jeff Rosen served on the steering committee of a conference to promote an “inclusive food system.” The event was sponsored by donors including the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the Walton Family Fund, both major contributors to anti-GMO causes since 2012, and featured speakers such as economist Charles Benbrook (p 5). Benbrook is well known for his industry-funded research promoting the benefits of organic food and warning about the dangers of the widely used weed killer glyphosate, frequently targeted by anti-pesticide groups as a cause of cancer.

The conference also included a panel dedicated to protecting (p 3) GMO labeling and transgenic crop bans from free-trade agreements, which could have “devastating impacts” on efforts to develop sustainable food systems, the organizers claimed.

A year earlier, Solidago’s environmental justice program director Sarah Christiansen participated in a “social change philanthropy” event, which promoted “efforts to stop GMOs and ‘Monsanto laws’ using case studies from Africa and Latin America.” Christiansen was also part of a related 2013 conference dedicated to advancing “social and ecological transformation.” The agenda included developing “defensive strategies” against GMOs, industrial agriculture and promoting agroecology as an alternative farming system. (p 12)

These activities are consistent with Solidago’s priorities going back to the mid 2000s. A 2012 study from the Environmental Grantmakers Association listed the Salidago Foundation as a donor to activism for “sustainable agriculture and food systems” as early as 2007. This included support for efforts to promote “organic and other forms of sustainable farming [and] …. opposition to the use of genetically modified crops and food irradiation ….” (p 29)

The Solidago Foundation is funded heavily by the Frances Fund, a wealthy nonprofit that finances progressive political activism. Solidago has received more than $25 million from the Frances Fund since 2012. Besides it support for Solidago, The fund has partnered with the Tides Foundation, a major contributor to anti-biotech groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council and Greenpeace. In 2012, Tides and the Frances Fund supported a project aimed at “mitigating climate change, restoring biodiversity and bringing back local food economies.”

Financial Data

 

Annual Revenue: $8,010, 026 (2017)

Total Assets:$ 7,002,709 (2017)

Major Donors (total contributions 2012-present)

The Frances Fund $ 25,610,000

Share via

Note that there are three “levels” of both donors and recipients.

Donors
Donations to advocacy groups are sometimes designated to support a specific cause, such as organic agriculture or mitigating climate change. There is no way for us to know from publicly-available documents on what the money will be spent, as we can only see the total amount donated. When we assign the levels below to donors and recipients, we assume that all donations are available to the recipient for all advocacy, including anti-GMO advocacy.

  • Level 1: Donates primarily to dedicated anti-GMO organizations
  • Level 2: A large portion of donations go to anti-GMO organizations; some donations go to organizations without a position on GMOs
  • Level 3: A small portion of donations go to anti-GMO organizations
    * Most donations go to organizations without a formal position on GMOs but which have aligned themselves with anti-GMO activists

Recipients
For Level 1 recipients, all donations are used for anti-GMO advocacy. For Level 2 and 3 recipients, we don’t know how much of each donation is used for anti-GMO advocacy.

  • Level 1: Dedicated to anti-GMO advocacy
  • Level 2: Involved in anti-GMO advocacy along with other causes
  • Level 3: No specific anti-GMO advocacy, but general support
    * Organizations without a formal position on GMOs but which have aligned themselves with anti-GMO activists
Send this to a friend